View Full Version : Whats a good dedicated host
mistinaj
October 29th, 2008, 08:16 PM
I am looking for a new dedicated server...
What is the BEST dedicated hosting company to hostr about 22k UV daily.
I currently have the following but my images loads really slow.
Intel 3210 Quad Core
Red Hat 4
15TB Bandwidth
2GB RAM
250GB HDD
100Mbps Bandwidth
If I increased anything such ram would it make my images load faster?
tylaa
October 29th, 2008, 08:17 PM
theplanet.com or softlayer.com
mistinaj
October 29th, 2008, 08:22 PM
what exactly is ram... does that make a server images load faster? Because someone told me I would need more ram...
adrian_nicolas
October 29th, 2008, 08:22 PM
my friend use to get 40k+ uvs a day and he was only on yahoos hosting plan. his site never went down or anything. it was fast and everything, but im new to all this.. so yeah. bloop
iteenzone
October 29th, 2008, 08:24 PM
yeah i heard yahoo hosting is good but i dont think they give u cpanel....
Do they?
mistinaj
October 29th, 2008, 08:27 PM
yahoo hosting would shut you down for too much bandwidth.. i dont host my images with photobucket. I host them on my server. I think they charge something like $10 per month or so.. for unlimited bandwidth but in the terms it stats they will pull the plug for excessive bw.
iteenzone
October 29th, 2008, 08:29 PM
seriously? that sucks
i thought yahoo was like unlimited everything
adrian_nicolas
October 29th, 2008, 08:29 PM
yeah i heard yahoo hosting is good but i dont think they give u cpanel....
Do they?
no, they dont. i host with them. but i think their "cpanel" is a lot more easier then the actual cpanel
adrian_nicolas
October 29th, 2008, 08:30 PM
yahoo hosting would shut you down for too much bandwidth.. i dont host my images with photobucket. I host them on my server. I think they charge something like $10 per month or so.. for unlimited bandwidth but in the terms it stats they will pull the plug for excessive bw.
ah true. it says it's unlimited everything, but most the time, it's really not.
iteenzone
October 29th, 2008, 08:32 PM
ah true. it says it's unlimited everything, but most the time, it's really not.
woah that sucks
adrian, what does the yahoo cpanel look like?
do u mind screenshotting?
i just wanna see how it looks
if not is ok =)
adrian_nicolas
October 29th, 2008, 08:36 PM
http://i37.tinypic.com/vpj4ee.png
tylaa
October 29th, 2008, 08:43 PM
i miss twisted :/ it was better than.. that one site
iteenzone
October 29th, 2008, 09:00 PM
twistedd.com?
yeah i liked that site too
and thanks for screen shotting
so thats what it looks like haha
not bad i can live with that
jmellors96
October 30th, 2008, 02:36 PM
To be honest, i'd stick to hostgator.com if you can afford it. There service is ace and rarely ever have problems. :D
Pooraffiliate
October 30th, 2008, 02:58 PM
yahoo hosting would shut you down for too much bandwidth.. i dont host my images with photobucket. I host them on my server. I think they charge something like $10 per month or so.. for unlimited bandwidth but in the terms it stats they will pull the plug for excessive bw.
Hosting your own images is very very very bad if you get big.. heres why.
Say you get 20,000 UVs per day
15,000 install images from your server per day
each installed image gets 100 views per day
so after day one, your server gets 20,000 + (15,000x100) =1,520,000 views
Day2: you get 3,040,000 views
day 3 you get 4,560,000 views
day 4...
day 5...
every day you add 1.5 million views to your server
As you can see your site grows exponentially.
Servers can only hold so much.. think of your server as a big 'pipe', you can only fit so much into the pipe before it starts to get clogged and take time for things to get through the pipe, which makes your images/website/whatever start to load slow as things get 'queued' up.
Plus bandwidth costs get outragous as you start serving all of these images every day, you use gigs and gigs of bandwith instantly.. hosts will either shut you down or you start paying 5k+/month for the bandwith it takes.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.