View Full Version : What's better than Tom at 3:00am?
Greg-J
November 30th, 2007, 02:48 AM
Greg at 3:00am.
I had this incredibly long expose` on my next big thing but my good sense got the best of me and this completely unrelated incite into the cosmos is all you get:
What the bleep do we know? (http://youtube.com/watch?v=Hi_UFSShQHU)
xJennax
November 30th, 2007, 03:00 AM
Wow I think about this quite often but I can't think about it for too long coz I get scared coz we have no idea what life is and where we came from. =/ lol
I've only watched a lil bit of this but I'm gonna watch the rest now.
DavidR
November 30th, 2007, 03:09 AM
She played Jerry's deaf girlfriend in Seinfeld.
Andrew2
November 30th, 2007, 03:11 AM
so she is deaf then?
when she spoke to that kid that looked like gary coleman she sounded deaf but those were the only words she spoke.
The idea behind the movie itself will be a neverending question that I doubt we will figure out because there's no answer to it.
Andrew2
November 30th, 2007, 03:15 AM
and if that water molecule thing is true then that's a trip in itself.
nando
November 30th, 2007, 06:06 AM
hmmm......
I've had plenty of these discussions with friends, I found that having alcohol is always needed..lol
Cyclops
November 30th, 2007, 06:21 AM
I don't share the solipsistic point of view that the movie states but I respect who does. What I disagree with this movie is the fact that they use an esoteric-metaphysical corruption of the Copenhagen interpretation of the quantum mechanics to make their statements and to pretend those are science based. The Copenhagen interpretation of the quentum mechanics is not the only one. (Look in google for Schrödinger cat) Any interpretation shuld not be taken as a the true implicit reallity.
Kyle
December 2nd, 2007, 04:58 PM
I love that movie ;). The Secret too
George
December 2nd, 2007, 05:39 PM
I don't share the solipsistic point of view that the movie states but I respect who does. What I disagree with this movie is the fact that they use an esoteric-metaphysical corruption of the Copenhagen interpretation of the quantum mechanics to make their statements and to pretend those are science based. The Copenhagen interpretation of the quentum mechanics is not the only one. (Look in google for Schrödinger cat) Any interpretation shuld not be taken as a the true implicit reallity.lol yeah the idea of words put on a bottle falls apart scientifically when you consider that there are several languages on earth.
Even with the which language is the authorative language discussion aside the words themselves were just ink on a plastic sticker with no more power than a blank sticker or a sticker with meaningless ink patterns. Wouldn't it take a person in the room to effect molecules if that were even possible at all?
Coincidental change anyone? I bet if you took that same water and put the same word on it and let it sit in that same lab it would change appearance again.
jdresse
December 2nd, 2007, 06:02 PM
I've stopped watching at 1/2: it reminded me of the university metaphysics classes I had in the 80's (got a major in philosophy). I parted with the philosophy thing when I found out that one of the great French philosopher, Bergson I think, said that Einstein did not understand anything about time... Descartes was OK for his time but now...?
Sergio
December 2nd, 2007, 07:54 PM
I'm intrigued. My entire life is based upon a similar concept (basically the same one). Where can I buy the entire thing? That page sends you to a Brazillian website.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.